A Canadian Girl Committed Suicide – And the RCMP did What??

Okay, honestly the latest news is that the RCMP has just re-opened the case, after thousands of online “inquiries” have focused new attention on the rape that was largely ignored and was considered the main factor in a young Canandian girl committing suicide as a result.

Now, let’s be fair (if there is any possible way to be “fair” about a case of rape), there is never a justification for “rape” turning into suicide except when parents and community fail to provide the support that the individual needs to understand that “rape” has very little to do with them personally, and far more to do with a lot of very warped values that society in general has developed over the last couple of hundred years in particular, and over the last several thousand years in general. But the peitition attempting to call attention to this individual case started off their “add your own message” block with “is this case important to you?” as their prompt. Here’s my response.

Important to me? Are you kidding? This is one of the MOST IMPORTANT REFORMATIONS of ALL INTERNATIONAL LAWS that need to be made today. Only outlawing war could save more lives than enforcing anti-rape laws.
Pinching a woman’s bottom in the Italian streetcar is NOT a sexual “assault” (anyone who knows anything about law, knows that “assault” assumes intent to commit harm, and this and most other so-called “assaults” have just weakened the case for social justice in the instances of actual rape, but when it IS unconsentual sexual intercourse, it needs to be treated as a serious crime, and the punishment should ALWAYS fit the crime, not some convenient plea bargain that suits the prosecutorial staff of the day. Canadians are outraged, but it is an international crisis, as you can tell if you ask any woman in India, or Afghanistan today. Rape is not murder, but it should never be allowed to become the cause of suicide either.


BITCOIN value Passes US$1 billion

Bitcoins’ suddenly significant perceived value may be news today, but this is hardly the first time for this kind of phenomenon.

Come, now, ladies, and gentlemen, please. Has no one read, or at least seen the television version of “The Ascent of Money: A Financial History of the World” by Niall Ferguson ? Paper, as a form of money was not even accepted until the middle classes merchants of the Renaissance started issuing “trade bills”, until the French government began paying their soldiers in Canada with playing card style currency in 1685 (www.econ.ucla.edu/workingpapers/wp815.pdf) followed shortly by the Ameicans in about 1690. (Not entirely coincidentaly my UCLA source says the Americans where paying their soldiers for an unsuccessful foray into Canada at that time.) It only took until about 1730 until the banks in England had a cash crunch crisis when everyone came around demanding real metal in exchange for their paper money. The point being that acceptance of any symbolic medium of exchange of value is dependent not on some underlying government but upon the willingness of the middle class to accept the value that the exchange medium represents.

There is no gold backing the value of the US dollar any more, nor is there any “concrete” value at all to the underground methods of exchange that have existed for hundreds of years

Paypal may have established a system of exchange that interacts with some banks, but their bits are no more or less valuable than their patrons (and cooperating banks) agree to attribute to them, and just like the international money market fluctuations between the “real” currency of the world can cost you more or less on that set of ruby earrings you purchased in Hong Kong today than you thought they did yesterday when you actually struck a deal with the merchant, so too, the value of a “bitcoin” may vary greatly from day to day (you should have tried to get something for your PRC RMB’s a few couple of decades ago, to know what a “nationally back currency” is worth). Hell, I can’t even find anyone who will give me more than a nickel for the 5 Euro note presently in my wallet from my last excursion to France after I forgot to exchange it at the airport before my departure.

Bitcoin may or may not have a bright future. Current bitcoin owners better hope that a few more billion of them are in broad public circulation soon, before some banking industry lobbyist gets to a few congressal representatitives to outlaw them in this country or others. And all of us should remember, that if we want prices for nickel and dime prices to reach the internet (for candy corn or software items), we should think long and hard about opposing any “software based” currency system that will promote that possibility sooner rather than later.

Stafford “Doc” Williamson

p.s. This item will likely get cross posted to my column on the American Chronicle syndicate of websites, sooner or later, if you want/need to find it again.

This was originally




%d bloggers like this: